IJAMCT LOGO

Guidelines for Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board

The Editor-in-Chief and members of the Editorial Board are fundamental to the operations and integrity of the International Journal of Advanced Medical and Clinical Therapeutics (IJAMCT). Their roles encompass overseeing the peer-review process, making critical decisions on manuscript acceptance, and shaping the strategic direction of the journal. This section provides detailed guidelines on the expectations and responsibilities for these key positions, emphasizing the importance of professionalism, confidentiality, transparency, and conflict of interest management.

Policy, Roles, and Responsibilities for:

  • Editor-in-Chief:

    1. Peer-Review Oversight: The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for overseeing the peer-review process, ensuring that it is conducted fairly, rigorously, and in a timely manner. This includes selecting appropriate reviewers, managing review assignments, and addressing any issues that arise during the review process.

    2. Decision Making: The Editor-in-Chief has the final authority on manuscript acceptance or rejection. This decision is based on the recommendations from reviewers, the manuscript’s adherence to the journal’s standards, and its contribution to the field.

    3. Strategic Direction: The Editor-in-Chief guides the strategic direction of the journal, including decisions related to editorial policies, scope, and overall vision. This involves working with the Editorial Board to set long-term goals and priorities for the journal.

  • Editorial Board Members:

    1. Reviewer Selection: Editorial Board members assist in identifying and recruiting qualified reviewers for submitted manuscripts. They should ensure that reviewers have the appropriate expertise and maintain impartiality.

    2. Review Process Support: Board members may provide guidance and support throughout the review process, including evaluating reviewer feedback and recommending further actions to the Editor-in-Chief.

    3. Editorial Contribution: Editorial Board members contribute to shaping the journal’s content and policies, including suggesting special issues, themes, and potential areas for development.

  • Professionalism:

    1. Ethical Standards: The Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board members are expected to adhere to the highest ethical standards. This includes acting with integrity, fairness, and impartiality in all editorial decisions and interactions.

    2. Confidentiality: Confidentiality is paramount in the editorial process. Editors must ensure that all manuscript-related information is kept confidential, including the content of submissions, reviewer comments, and the status of manuscripts.

    3. Transparency: Transparency in decision-making is crucial. Editors should provide clear, well-documented reasons for their decisions on manuscripts and ensure that the process is transparent to authors and reviewers.

  • Conflict of Interest:

    1. Disclosure: Editors must disclose any conflicts of interest that could influence their editorial decisions. This includes financial, personal, or professional interests that may bias their judgment.

    2. Management: In cases where a conflict of interest is identified, the Editor-in-Chief or relevant Board member should recuse themselves from decisions related to the manuscript in question. Alternative editorial members or processes should be used to handle the review and decision-making.

  • Commitment to Quality:

    1. Continuous Improvement: Editors are responsible for continually seeking ways to improve the journal’s editorial practices and overall quality. This may involve staying updated with developments in the field, adopting new technologies, and enhancing review processes.

    2. Training and Development: Editors should engage in ongoing professional development to stay current with best practices in scholarly publishing and peer review.

  • Editorial Integrity:

    1. Ethical Conduct: All editorial decisions should be based on the quality and scientific merit of the manuscripts. Personal relationships, external pressures, or biases should not influence editorial decisions.

    2. Accountability: Editors are accountable for their decisions and actions. They must address any concerns or complaints regarding editorial practices and work to resolve them in a fair and timely manner.

  • Collaboration and Communication:

    1. Teamwork: The Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board members should work collaboratively to support the journal’s mission and goals. Effective communication and cooperation among the team are essential for the journal’s success.

    2. Feedback and Improvement: Editors should be open to feedback from authors, reviewers, and colleagues, and use this input to make improvements to the journal’s processes and policies.

The guidelines for the Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board of IJAMCT outline the essential responsibilities and standards for maintaining the journal’s academic and ethical integrity. By adhering to these guidelines, editors contribute to the journal’s reputation for excellence, ensure a fair and transparent peer-review process, and help guide the journal’s strategic development. Professionalism, confidentiality, transparency, and conflict of interest management are central to their roles, ensuring that the journal continues to serve as a credible and respected platform for medical and clinical research.